Law Library Notes

August 11, 2014

When a Monkey Takes a Selfie

Filed under: Uncategorized — George Butterfield @ 3:11 pm

When a monkey takes a selfie on your camera, who owns the copyright? This is being discussed here.

Share

July 31, 2014

Bar Exam Snafu

Filed under: Uncategorized — George Butterfield @ 8:37 am

New law graduates in many states experienced a technology snafu at the worst  possible time Tuesday night: as they were attempting to upload bar examinations  just before deadlines in their states. Many reported spending hours trying and  failing to upload their answers.

Read the full article here.

Share

July 21, 2014

Movies and Court Martials

Filed under: Uncategorized — George Butterfield @ 3:07 pm

The Law Librarians of Congress blog has a nice article on movies that cover famous court martials. You can check out the article here. One of the movies discussed is Breaker Mourant which can be checked out of the library.

Share

July 10, 2014

SAGE Publications Busts “Peer Review and Citation Ring”

Filed under: Uncategorized — George Butterfield @ 1:31 pm

This one deserves a “wow.”

SAGE Publishers is retracting 60 articles from the Journal of Vibration and Control after an investigation revealed a “peer review and citation ring” involving a professor in Taiwan.

Read the full article here.

Share

June 30, 2014

Burwell v. Hobby Lobby

Filed under: Uncategorized — George Butterfield @ 9:37 am

Read the opinion here.

Share

June 28, 2014

Should rap lyrics be used as evidence in court?

Filed under: Uncategorized — Troy Johnson @ 10:54 pm

PBS NewsHour – Based largely on a rap he wrote, and accounts of two witnesses given years after the shooting, rapper Antwain Steward was arrested and charged with double murder. Critics contend rap is a musical art form that should not be taken as evidence of criminal behavior. But some prosecutors say they don’t buy the argument that the work is all fiction. See video here.

Share

June 26, 2014

Supreme Court Curbs President’s Power to Make Recess Appointments

Filed under: Uncategorized — Troy Johnson @ 3:46 pm

The Supreme Court dealt a significant blow to executive power, cutting back on the president’s power to issue recess appointments during brief breaks in the Senate’s work. Full article here.

Share

Supreme Court limits cell phone searches, TV signal sharing

Filed under: Uncategorized — Troy Johnson @ 3:44 pm

Marcia Coyle with the National Law Journal discusses these recent cases on the PBS Newshour.

Share

June 19, 2014

Identifying Judicial Empathy: Does Having Daughters Cause Judges to Rule for Women’s Issues?

Filed under: Uncategorized — Troy Johnson @ 11:10 am

Interesting article: Identifying Judicial Empathy: Does Having Daughters Cause Judges to Rule for Women’s Issues?

Abstract:
In this paper, we ask whether personal relationships can affect the way that judges decide cases. To do so, we leverage the natural experiment of a child’s gender to identify the effect of having daughters on the votes of judges. Using new data on the family lives of U.S. Courts of Appeals judges, we find that, conditional on the number of children a judge has, judges with daughters consistently vote in a more feminist fashion on gender issues than judges who have only sons. This result survives a number of robustness tests and appears to be driven primarily by Republican judges. More broadly, this result demonstrates that personal experiences influence how judges make decisions, and it is the first paper to show that empathy may indeed be a component in how judges decide cases.

You can download the full article here.

Share

June 16, 2014

When Innocent People Go To Prison, States Pay

Filed under: Uncategorized — Troy Johnson @ 6:19 pm

Suppose you spent five years in prison for a crime you didn’t commit. How much does the government owe you?

Over the past few decades, the rise of DNA exonerations has made this a more pressing question. And many states have created explicit policies to answer it.

But those policies vary wildly from state to state.

Twenty-one states provide no money — though people who are exonerated can sue for damages. Twelve states and the District of Columbia award damages on a case-by-case basis. Another 17 states pay a fixed amount per year of imprisonment.

Full article here.

Share
Older Posts »

Powered by WordPress