IEI Insight: Time is right for school choice in Nebraska

This IEI Insight is provided by Clara Jace, a Gail Werner-Robertson Fellow and author of a forthcoming paper on Nebraska education policy.

It is a truth universally acknowledged that parents desire the absolute best for their children. This fundamental part of the American Dream is at the heart of the most recent strides made towards increased school choice for each American family, regardless of race, socioeconomic status, or the neighborhood they call home. The urgency of expanding school choice has not become sufficiently mainstream though. As a nation, the United States falls short on both educational achievement and the amount of school choice when compared to the rest of the world.

School choice expert Caroline Hoxby has conducted an analysis on the feasible increase in school productivity, as measured by national test scores (NAEP points) per thousand dollars of pupil spending. Hoxby’s conclusion is compelling: “if choice were simply to restore productivity to its 1970–71 level, then the average student in the United States would be scoring at an advanced level where fewer than 10 percent of students now score.”

Continue reading IEI Insight: Time is right for school choice in Nebraska

Free Trade, Carrier, and Social Capital — Trust in the Marketplace

As discussed in my prior post, free trade commitments produce winners and losers based on diffused decisions in the marketplace, rather than centralized government choices. The capacity of government to redistribute creates a market for influencing those decisions. This likely explains the fact that the Washington, D.C. metro area has the largest concentration of so-called “super Zips”, which reflect where high-earning individuals live. Brokering that redistribution apparently pays very well. (For more on this topic, see this story and interactive map: http://www.washingtonpost.com/sf/local/2013/11/09/washington-a-world-apart/ . And that compensation likely comes from the rest of us.

Continue reading Free Trade, Carrier, and Social Capital — Trust in the Marketplace

Are Soda Taxes the Right Prescription for the UK’s Obese?

2000px-Obesity-waist_circumference.svg

IEI Alumnus Michael Kotrous submitted the following opinion piece. 

Britain announced that it will soon begin taxing soda and other sugary beverages in an effort to curb obesity. The tax has intuitive appeal as the developed world, including the United States, shifts individual healthcare spending from the individual’s paycheck to the government’s coffers. The obese will either pay more taxes over their lifetime of drinking soda so that they contribute more to government-sponsored healthcare, which they are more likely to “cash in” on at some point in their life, or lessen the unhealthy behavior, which makes them less a burden on social healthcare spending. Policy leaders have emphasized the latter effect as the rationale for creating these taxes.

Continue reading Are Soda Taxes the Right Prescription for the UK’s Obese?

Free Trade and the Political Milieu

Free trade is like virtue – it is widely approved, but hard to practice.  Carrier Corporation’s recent announcement that it is moving manufacturing operations from Indiana to Mexico illustrates this tension.

Carrier, a subsidiary of United Technologies, manufactures heating and cooling systems and related products.  It also claims the mantle of an environmental steward: “Whether it’s reducing our greenhouse gas impact, leading the phase-out of ozone-depleting refrigerants, or introducting many of the world’s most energy efficient building solutions, at Carrier, we incorporate sustainability in all that we do. To us, it’s only natural.” https://www.carrier.com/carrier/en/us/sustainability/

Continue reading Free Trade and the Political Milieu

IEI Insight: Anticipation, not content, of Fed announcements may be driving markets

This IEI Insight is provided by Ryan Coughlin, a Gail Werner-Robertson Fellow and author of a forthcoming paper analyzing the effect of Federal Reserve announcements on market activity.

Previous research has shown that “surprise” portions of macroeconomic announcements have significant effects on financial markets. Further, the magnitudes of announcement effects are influenced by governmental monetary policy. Macroeconomic announcement effects follow a simple pattern: if the economy, as measured by the data in the announcement, is better than anticipated by the market consensus, equity prices are likely to trend upward for the day and bond prices are likely to head lower for the day. In other words, a macroeconomic announcement effect is the market’s reaction to incorporate unexpected historical data. However, the previous research on announcement effects was completed prior to the most recent economic downturn and the unprecedented Federal Reserve monetary policy that stemmed from it. After the implementation of monetary policies such as quantitative easing and near-zero interest rates, macroeconomic announcement effects differed from the conclusions of previous research.

Continue reading IEI Insight: Anticipation, not content, of Fed announcements may be driving markets

The Economic Milieu

Winston Churchill is often quoted for his observation, “The best argument against Democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter.” Or as some might say in these times, a fifteen-second sound bite from Presidential candidates as reported in the mainstream media.

The campaign so far has not generated much serious conversation about the serious budgetary challenges facing our country. According to a recent CBO analysis, the federal budget deficit this year will rise to $544 billion, about 2.9 percent of GDP, up from 2.5 percent of GDP in 2015. While federal revenues will grow at a respectable 3.9 percent, federal spending will grow by even more – 6.3 percent. This is not a path to fiscal soundness.

Continue reading The Economic Milieu

IEI Insight: Who pays for a higher minimum wage?

This week’s IEI Insight is provided by Renato Morais, a Gail Werner-Robertson Fellow and author of a forthcoming paper on the Nebraska minimum wage.

When we think of increasing the minimum wage, many people believe it is going to help the workers most in need — that it is going to provide them a “living wage.” But who needs more help: those workers who already have a job but earn a low wage, or those who do not have a job at all? A minimum wage increase does not help the worst off of the worst off. It does not even help all of the minimum wage earners.

Who earns the minimum wage? Half of minimum wage employees are between the ages of 16 and 24. Of these, 79 percent are part-time high school students, college students, and entry-level workers — they are not the primary breadwinners of their household. Their average family income is $65,900, and only 22 percent of them live at or below the poverty line. The other half of workers earning the minimum wage — those 25 and older — have an average family income of $42,500, and only a quarter of them live at or below the poverty line. Thus, raising the minimum wage only “helps” a tiny portion of those who the public believes it is intended to help.

Continue reading IEI Insight: Who pays for a higher minimum wage?

IEI Insight: Employment Support is Good Medicine for Autistic Individuals

This week’s IEI Insight is provided by Joe Kreienkamp, a Gail Werner-Robertson Fellow and co-author of a forthcoming paper on autism spectrum disorders and employment.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention identify autism spectrum disorder (ASD) as the fastest growing developmental disability in the United States. Affecting 1 in 42 males and 1 in 189 females, ASD is five times more prevalent in boys than girls. The “developmental disability that can cause significant social, communication and behavioral challenges” can be problematic for individuals and their families.

There are both opportunity costs and financial costs of supporting an autistic individual. In a study conducted by JAMA Pediatrics, the national cost of supporting children with ASD was $61 billion dollars. For adults, the cost was $175 billion per year. As one study indicated, “the cost of supporting an individual with an ASD and intellectual disability during his or her lifespan was $2.4 million in the United States. The cost of supporting an individual with an ASD without intellectual disability was $1.4 million in the United States.” Furthermore, most families who support an autistic child must forfeit one parent’s income to support the child.

Continue reading IEI Insight: Employment Support is Good Medicine for Autistic Individuals

The Problem of Cash

One area of my research involves payment systems and the role of financial intermediaries in fulfilling various government functions, including tax and criminal enforcement. When we use banks or credit card networks to pay others, we create electronic records that can be accessed by the government for various purposes. (The same is true when we use our cell phones, but encryption may make it difficult to access such information – a problem unfolding in the current controversy with Apple.)

Anti-money laundering (AML) rules impose some obligations on financial intermediaries to identify their customers, know something of their business, and report suspicious transactions. Tax reporting rules also require tracking and reporting of certain kinds of payments – including interest, dividends, and other revenue sources. This allows the government to “trust, but verify” positions taken by its citizens, ensuring that our voluntary tax reporting system remains functional. Continue reading The Problem of Cash

Primordial Brain Modules?

Dr. Michael Munger of Duke University delivered a very interesting lecture at the Heider College of Business on Friday, February 5. He explored problems associated with price gouging laws, which proscribe the practice of raising prices during a state of emergency. Those trained in economics are likely to understand that such laws are likely to harm those affected by emergency conditions. Prices provide important signals to the marketplace, allowing consumers to allocate scarce resources based on where they are valued most. Moreover, those higher prices are likely to trigger increased supplies, thereby providing the impetus for consumer demands to be met and lower prices in the near future. Obfuscating the price signal through legal constraints does not change Continue reading Primordial Brain Modules?